MEMO TO THE REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHEMENT:

Successful politics is CHANGING PERCEPTION; not yielding to it.

Does the name RONALD REAGAN ring a bell? You know - the Conservitive guy you fought tooth and nail in Republican primaries, and yet DESPITE YOU became the most successful and influencial Republican icon since Lincoln by confronting the Left with BOLD Conservatism?

Remember that guy?

EITHER YOU START DEFEATING THE LEFT OR WE WILL DEFEAT YOU.
-November, 7th 2012

(SCROLL DOWN TO VIEW SELECTED PAGE)

'Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us'

My Mission

I created Confront the Left to help defeat the Left in America, by creating a more balanced debate.

My targets are contemporary Liberals: Authoritarians, Statists, counter-revolutionaries, Alinskyites, Democrats, Marxists, Socialists, Progressives, Moderates, special rights groups, Environmentalists, Jihad enablers, leftist Republicans and those who seek to change America.

Much focus will be given to the (3) indoctrination arms of the Left: our main-stream media (MSM), the entertainment industry, and our school system.

I will argue the case for Conservatism (Classic Liberalism) over the soft to hard tyrannies of the Left, which seek to conserve all but liberty, under the veil of compassion.

Confront the Left is committed to confronting the Left's Ant-Americanism, Anti-Semitism, it's logic, lies, semantics, unethical behavior, usurpations, subversive intentions, amoral strategies, criminality, hypocrisy, promotion of victim-hood, promotion of racial inequality, promotion of gender inequality, and ends justify the means strategy.

I will expose the Left's contempt for facts, history, the Scienctific Method, economics, and the Constitution with special attention given to the Eco-Marxist's (term coined by Mark Levin) most brazen assault on Liberty: Global Warming, AKA Climate Change.

Confront the Left will call out the un-patriotic elements and characters on the Left, no matter how loud they decry - I will let no one question my love of this country!

I will expose the reality of Islamic Jihad (Terrorism) as the Left pacifies it.

I will prove that the consolidation of power is the ruling principal of Liberalism.

This blog will help pressure the party of personal responsibility (Republican Party) to start acting and talking like Conservatives.

As the Left struggles to hide it's intent in order to win elections, Conservatism must make it's principles known in order to win elections. Both agendas are motivated by the same realization that Americans will choose Liberty over Collectivism when both arguments are fairly represented.

Political Correctness WILL NOT be represented here; just the naked truth.

Claims made against the Left, including all groups that fit in this tent to some degree, are general statements and ARE NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT ALL who fall into such categories. I understand that most people do not fit their labels entirely, and that there are exceptions and variations of character and thought amongst political movements.

DISCLAIMER: Any Image (Photo, Cartoon, Slogan, etc.) displayed on ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com (this blog) with out ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com indicated on such image is not the creative property of the creator of this blog.

Any image displayed on this blog that is the creative property of the creator of this blog will indicate ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com on such image.

Any literary work (posts, linked material, commentary, etc.) that is not authored by the creator of this blog is italicized or parenthesized.

All literary work displayed on this blog that is not italicized or parenthesized is authored by the creator of this blog, and will usually state so.

Contact: ConfronttheLeft@gmail.com

My Strategy

Intellectual confrontation is unique in that the means need to justify the ends. This makes intellectual confrontation necessarily limited, and limiting to those who seek power. This understanding lies at the heart of The Enlightenment / Conservatism.

The intellectual battle is like a cage fight; one cannot get out of the cage to win.

Unlike intellectual confrontation, victory in psychological confrontation, like physical confrontation, has no such dependency.

The contemporary Liberal (Statist) is a psychological fighter by vein necessity. He/She subverts the cage to play on the perception of the crowd. They create an appearance of victory and claim to have broken the neck of the Conservative.

He/She is only equipped to fight in the boundless arena of the ends justify the means.

The Conservative must drag the Alinskyite, kicking and screaming, into the cage. It will be ugly, but the crowd will be able to witness and verify the broken neck of the Statist for themselves.

Let’s role...

Dec 29, 2009

'Historic' Says Harry - ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com

Links to this post


Harry Reid, Republic Enemy # 3, compared the resistance to the Democrat’s pursuit of an authoritarian healthcare system (a resistance which includes the majority of Americans) to those who dug their heals in against the abolition of slavery, against women’s suffrage, and against the Civil Rights Movement. Reid said:

This is indeed historic and I'm not afraid to say it is. Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this: Slow down, stop everything, let's start over. If you think you've heard these same excuses before, you're right. When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said, "Slow down, it's too early, let's wait." When women spoke up for the right to speak up, they wanted to vote. Some insisted they simply slow down. When this body was on the verge of guaranteeing equal civil rights to everyone, regardless the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today.

I have a quote for Senator Reid from Vladimir Lenin, another authoritarian:

Medicine is the keystone of the arch of Socialism.

Reid and the gang know this, which is why the Left has been peddling this historic moment for 80 years.

Reid is actually right about a couple points. There were those who dug in their heels against the abolition of slavery. In English, the correct term for those people is Democrats (mostly southern Democrats).


To assist the current House Majority Leader, I’ve linked to Dr. Samuel Blumenfeld’s brief overview of the Democratic Party’s core involvement in the creation and longevity of slavery in America. - SKELETONS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CLOSET - NewsWithViews.com

The Republican Party was the Abolition party. In fact, the party was born out the demand for an abolitionist party that could defeat southern Democrats.



1866 Pennsylvania gubernatorial race

There were also those who dug in their heels in against women’s suffrage. What’a ya know - those people were predominantly Democrats too.

Like JFK and LBG supported civil rights for Blacks to the extent that public opinion dictated, President Woodrow Wilson (D) was also less than enthusiastic about defending a woman’s right to vote until he gave way to political pressure.



Woman picketing Woodrow Wilson (D)
outside of White House, 1917

The majority of Republicans supported a woman’s right to vote, while Democrats remained split.
Linda Sue Grimes details this point with her column Women and the Republican Party:
Suffrage Rights First Fought for by Republicans
- Suite101.com.



Women picketing President Woodrow Wilson (D)
outside of White House, 1917



And yes there were those who dug in their heels against our country's 2nd civil rights movement in the late 1950’s through the 1960’s. Once again, those heal diggers were predominantly Democrats.



1868 Cartoon threatening that the KKK would lynch carpetbaggers
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Independent Monitor


I recommend reading The Democrat Race Lie - a remarkable time-line of America’s civil rights struggle - put together by Black-and-Right.com.

Black-and-Right.com

It starts with:

October 13, 1858 During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) states: “I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my brother, or any kin to me whatever”; Douglas became Democratic Party’s 1860 presidential nominee

It ends with a quote from Margaret Sanger - founder of so called Planned Parenthood, and liberal icon:

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population….

Pay particular attention to the congressional voting records for both parties on civil rights legislation since the end of the Civil War, and through ALL OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS FROM 57' - 68'.
I’m trying to help Senator Reid get his point across accurately.

How the 1924 DNC voted on an anti-Klan plank

Be sure to watch SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: American History in Black and White (Video) - NMATV.com - bottom of The Democrat Race Lie time-line.

Unlike most documentaries on American civil rights, which negate any Republican references regarding the struggle while romanticizing Democrat figures like John F. Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, and LBJ, this documentary destroys revisionist history.

Democrat anti-negro, anti-Republican cartoon

President Dwight Eisenhower (R) resurrected the civil rights cause for American Blacks in the 1950’s after an 80 year drought, while paving the way for future civil rights successes.
Yet, when was the last time you heard Eisenhower and civil rights uttered in the same breath?

There is plenty of room for criticism of Eisenhower’s civil rights record, but he clearly took more initiative on civil rights than did any of the aforementioned Democrats, who the media regularly adorn with civil rights accolades.

President Dwight Eisenhower (R)

David Nichols - Presidential historian - brings attention to Eisenhower’s role in the Civil Rights Movement with his book - A Matter of Justice: Eisenhower and the Beginning of the Civil Rights Revolution.


I have yet to see one documentary on the Civil Rights Movement that details Eisenhower’s efforts behind the 1957 Civil Rights Act, or that mentions that John F. Kennedy voted against it as a Senator (D-MA).

Frances Rice - a lawyer and chairman of the National Black Republican Association (NBRA) -
did her part in taking such mythology to task with her column - Harry Reid Twists Civil Rights History To Bash GOP - RightsideNews.com.



Frances Rice, chairman of the NBRA


At a time when Marxist-Socialist (Progressive) views began to take root amongst northern Democrats, the polls in America began to reflect increasing support for Black equality.

As it has always been necessary for Marxist-Socialist movements to exploit the fears and desires of the so called have nots through class warfair propaganda, northern Democrats saw the shift in American polity, and seized the opportunity to exploit the very word itself while covering up the party’s 180 year effort to keep inequality institutionalized.

In defense of their party, the Left asserts that racist Southerners switched to the Republican Party simply because such Southerners were so put off by the extent of the Democrat Party’s role in the success of the 2nd civil rights movement.

Of course this makes perfect sense; that southern racist Democrats would leave their party that was, to a significant degree, against ALL of the civil rights acts to join a party that was, by in large, committed to ALL of the civil rights acts.

Yet Leftists can’t seem to point to any sudden racist shift in the Republican Party platform that would have seduced such racist southern Democrats. -Go figure

In reality, the shift in southern party affiliation occurred over the course of three decades and was due to numerous factors.


Southerners of the time, aside from their racist hypocrisy, were religious conservatives who could no longer relate to their party the more their party embraced special rights for non-whites, a deepening Socialist agenda, and the abandonment of religious tradition and rights.

Gerard Alexander - an associate professor of political science at the University of Virginia and contributor to the American Enterprise Institute - explains The Myth of the Racist Republicans - Claremont.org.

Over time, the Republican Party’s race neutral Conservative platform became the preferable option for many Southerners, even for some who may have retained bigoted sentiments.

The bottom line is that the South has left it’s racist past in the past, and is probably one of the least racially pre-occupied regions in the country today.


Next time a Liberal speaks of the contemporary South as a bastion of bigots, ask them a few simple questions:


* Why are more Blacks moving to the South than to any other region?

* Why is it that 55% of America’s Black population now resides in the South?

* Why are their more black elected officials in the South today than in any other region of the country?



55% of American Blacks must be Uncle Toms – I’m sure.

Ivy Sellers gives some perspective changing insight about the South and the North in her column - Southern Culture Under Siege - HumanEvents.com

By the way, Senator Reid; those filibuster threats were more than threats. They were record long actual filibusters by Sen. Strom Thurmond (D-SC) and Robert Byrd (D-WV).



Robert Byrd (D-WV)

Strom Thurmond talked against the 1957 Civil Rights Bill for 24 hours and 18 minutes, setting an all-time record.

Robert Byrd (D-WV), former member - Kleagle of the KKK and current Democrat Senator, performed the longest filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act speaking for 14 hours and 13 minutes.

(Can you imagine how much CO2 these two filibusters emitted into our fragile atmosphere? Could it be that Democrat opposition to civil rights was the catalyst for Human Induced Global Warming (HIGW)…I mean Climate Change?

I’m doing my best to keep up with this Human Induced Terminology Change.)

It will truly be a historic day when Harry Reid and the posse acknowledge and apologize for the Democratic Party’s insidious role in American slavery, the repealing of post Civil War Reconstruction, the KKK, the Black Codes - Jim Crow Laws, the denial of voting rights for women, and for subsequently projecting such inhumanity on the very party that played a vital role in defeating it all.

I think Robert Byrd would be the perfect Democrat to deliver the Democratic parties official apology, considering his past experiences. But then again it would be a tough choice.

If you are a Democrat, have you written to your Democrat Senator, Obama, or the DNC to demand that your party officially recognize and apologize for it’s crucial role in the suppression of civil rights?
If not - WHY NOT?

I’ll leave with a Pelosi Statement on Senator Robert Byrd Becoming Longest-Serving Member of Congress - IBTimes.com:

Senator Robert Byrd's remarkable life is defined by service to his state and to his country. Over the course of his momentous career in the House and the Senate, he has not simply witnessed moments of political progress, he has stood at the forefront of legislative achievements that have improved the lives of millions of Americans.

As Congress' foremost scholar on the Constitution, Senator Byrd has used the legislative process to advance the common good. He has spoken truth to power when needed, stood on principle when no one else would, and knew when to compromise when the time came.

I offer my congratulations to Senator Byrd on reaching such an extraordinary milestone today. His name will forever remain etched in the history books for his exceptional accomplishment and courage. For nearly 57 years, he has worked tirelessly for the good of our great nation, while never forgetting the people back home in West Virginia. Long may his voice continue to provide inspiration for all Members of Congress and the American people.


Nov 18, 2009

What's In a Logo? - ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com

Links to this post

For those of us who have been paying attention to the seemingly endless number of spears in Obama’s side (all rendered benign by our media and by many American citizens willing to digest their daily dose of Statist rhetoric) the fallowing revelation will not surprise.

Obama’s guilt by collaboration (not association) with Bill Ayers (Communist Anti-American domestic terrorist with the Weather Underground), may run even deeper than what those of us who are blinded by reality originally thought.

For those of you who have mentally de-clawed Obama’s anti-American goals and passions, this may cause your cognitive-dissidence to swell.
I recently stumbled upon a few websites that displayed Obama’s campaign logo (O logo) alongside Weather Underground (WU) logos for comparative purposes. Each website picked up on some striking similarities between the O logo and the 2 WU logos.








Zomblog displays the first issue of Osawatomie, a newspaper published by the Weather Underground in 1975. The paper’s content can be viewed on their site.

Zomblog shows the circular WU logo (displayed on the the newspaper’s cover) with the O logo.



I Own the World shows a comparison of the WU Weather Eye Logo and the O logo.

Upon viewing the comparisons, I immediately noticed something that even these great websites have not picked up on. I saw the O logo, in it’s entirety, as a simple and precise borrowing of the two WU logos.

I decided to do a little research on the creation of the O logo. Obviously, Sol Sender, the lead creator of the O logo, does not mention the WU logos as inspiration. But, I found what was the O logo before it’s final subtle tweak.

This fallowing image of the campaign logo brought my vision of the borrowing of the 2 WU logos too clear to sit on.


Here is Sol Sender in his own words:

Originally the stripes were kind of symmetrically expressed across the horizon, and as we went into final refinements we felt that giving it a little bit more dimension, a little bit more motion, ways to enter into it a little bit more for the viewer was a better way to go.

Only 20 minutes after I began to re-create the O logo using ONLY the 2 WU logos, this was the result along side the pre-dimension O logo.



It was too easy:

FIRST - I brought the top portion of the rainbow like WU logo to the middle of the circular WU logo.

SECOND - I cut out a circle along the circular WU logo parameters.

That was it.

I am not saying this is incontrovertible proof that Obama used the WU logos to create his O logo.

I am saying that this apparent link is extraordinary and should be looked into further, if possible.


If, in fact, the O logo was born out of the 2 WU logos, it would confirm that Obama is the true believer – the radical that I and many others know he is. It would mean that Obama felt he needed a symbol of radicalism (Marxism essentially) for him to privately identify with, while the masses see a crop-field (more like a Mao rice field) under a rising sun inside an O.

Obviously, there are countless symbols, logos, branding styles, and creative possibilities detached from WU symbolism which Obama could have drawn from - if he wanted to. There were countless possibilities for logos which would have been just as effective from a marketing standpoint. And it’s not as if the WU logos are particularly inspirational pieces of design.

If you think there is nothing significant about this apparent connection between the O logo and the WU logos, please take only 20 minutes of your time to re-create the O logo from any other single organization’s branding, in just two simple steps resulting in such a precise likeness.

As we conservatives thrive on having our theories challenged, (No - the debate is not over) I’m curious to see if someone can do it.


Oct 14, 2009

Yes Mr. Reich (Obama Economic Adviser), Audio Recording Technology Did Exist in 2007 - ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com

Links to this post

Like many contemporary Statists, Obama advisor and former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich stumps upon the realization that concealing what one utters to a paticular audiance, in modern times, isn't as easy as it used to be.



The DNC put out an official response to the blogosphere's focus on this audio recording of Reich's 2007 UC Berkely Political Science speech.

Here are a couple more unfortunate moments of candid speech from the left regarding the current health-care debate:









Remember all the MSM hype over Sarah Palin's death panel assesment of Obama-Care?

For those of you who are sceptics regarding whether a pervasive leftist bias exists within our MSM, take a moment to conduct a small test of your own:

Google search Robert Reich, we’re going to let you die, and include the name of any mainstream news outlet like CNN, The New York Times, MSNBC, CBS, The Washington Post, Associated Press, etc.

Then Google search Sarah Palin, death panel, and include the same mainstream news outlet name.

Sep 28, 2009

White House Muzzles Medi-Care Contracted Insurance Companies -ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com

Links to this post
The White House put a gag order out after Humana Insurance Co. sent mailings to it’s insured warning them that new health-care legislation could cut their Medi-Care benefits.


You liberal 1st Amendment - Freedom of Speech protecting activists should be screaming your little heads off in traffic by now. What about you guys at the ACLU? Anything to say?

You people are as unprincipled as you are predictable. And you wonder why those of us with backbones call you the Marxists that you are. Or do you wonder?

It appears that Max Baucus (D-MO), Finance Committee Chairman, urged the White House to implement the gag order. This is the same Max Baucus who is trying to push through the health-don't-care bill. And what is his argument?

It is wholly unacceptable for insurance companies to mislead seniors regarding any subject. False claims in the Humana letter to beneficiaries include the threat of seniors losing benefits in the Medicare Advantage program. In fact, the America’s Health Future Act does not include cuts to Medicare benefits.

Really? What part of the 1st Amendment states that the government can infringe upon misleading political speech? If the government has the authority to stifle political speech which it deems misleading, then what is the purpose of the 1st Amendment Sen. Baucus?
The federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) stated:

We are concerned that the materials Humana sent to our beneficiaries may violate Medicare rules by appearing to contain Medicare Advantage and prescription drug benefit information, which must be submitted to CMS for review.

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had a few words to say on the matter.

CNSNews.com reported that the letters have disclaimers that state:

Neither the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services nor the Medicare program has reviewed these materials for accuracy or misrepresentation.

CNSNews.com claims that the self addressed return envelopes were addressed to Humana’s corporate office in Kentucky, not to CMS in Washington, D.C.

CNSNews.com also states that the letter bears Humana’s corporate logo and was signed by Humana’s chief medical officer.

In case you haven’t been duly informed by our MSM, Douglas Elmendorf, director of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), backed Humana’s claim during testimony before Sen. Baucus' own Senate Finance Committee:

The effect of the original chairman’s mark on Medicare Advantage enrollment in 2019, would be a reduction of roughly 2.7 million people or 20 percent of the enrollment - The competitive bidding process would reduce the extra benefits that would be made available to beneficiaries through Medicare Advantage plans.

Elmendorf added:

The additional benefits would be smaller: $42 in additional benefits per month in 2019, and it’s a little less than half of what we would project under current law.
Take a look at Sen. Baucus’ (D-MO) attempt at silencing Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) on the floor of congress.

How come the Left hasn't accused Douglas Elmendorf, director of the CBO, of being a racist...yet? I mean come on, he's a white guy...in a suit...with budget numbers that differ from Obama's...and Obama is half black. Obviously he's a gigantic racist. You Democrats are really taking your eyes off the ball here.

Take a look at Sen. Baucus’ attempt at silencing Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) on the floor of congress.

And last week, Sen John Kerry (D-MA) disagreed with a Republican proposal to have the would be health-careless bill put on-line for a 72 hour public viewing. Kerry stated:

This is fundamentally a delay tactic. I mean, let's be honest about it. The legislative language, everybody knows, is relatively arcane, legalistic, and most people don't read the legislative language.

Hm...is a fundamental delay tactic worse then a regular delay tactic?

So what are you worried about Sen.Kerry; a 3 day delay?

If Sen. Kerry’s comment isn’t incriminating enough for those of you who don’t know when you’re being conned, here’s what Obama said during his speech at the University of Maryland to an audience of college students on September 18th:

Health care is about more than the details of a policy. It’s about what kind of country you want to be. Young people, it's about what kind of country you want to be.

Did he really say that, you ask? Yes

I wonder how many students thought to themselves - gee, that's what my English professor lectured on this morning.

America, Washington has a message for you that I will translate into English for those of you who don’t have a Liberish to English translator:
Hope is here, so shut up, stop asking questions, and get out of the way.




Sep 19, 2009

Meet Officer Wesley Cheeks Jr. -ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com

Links to this post
Officer Wesley Cheeks Jr. (a Fairfax County Public School Security Officer in Reston, VA) threatened to arrest an Anti-Obama health-care protester for holding up a sign amidst numerous other sign carrying protesters; for and against Obama’s health-care rationing plan. This incident was caught on video outside of Jim Moran’s (D-VA) town hall meeting at South Lakes High School on August 25th 2009.

Wesley Cheeks Jr.

This protester’s sign read Organizing for National Socialist Health Care - The Final Solution, with an image of an Obama Joker. Mr. Cheeks told the protester:

If I told you once to take it down and you put it back up, I can charge you with whatever I want to charge you with.

The protester replied This used to be America!

Officer Cheeks replied It ain't no more, OK?

What was Wesley Cheeks' explanation for why the protester’s sign could not be displayed like the rest?:

This has got a picture on it. That don't have a picture on it.

My guess is that Officer Cheeks will not be teaching English at South Lakes High School. Then again, they may have an affirmative-action policy.

How often do we hear the left decry freedom of speech and abuse of power? Has anybody on the left condemned Mr. Cheeks? Have you seen any news coverage on this abuse of authority?

I found one article about the incident by The Observer.

I’m sure CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, the AP, The Washington Post, The NY Times, and the LA Times have been banging down Officer Cheeks door for answers to all of their burning questions. I bet they are all investigating the man’s criminal record, tax liabilities, security license status, and personal affairs like they did to Joe the Plumber…and like they do to anyone who challenges their leftist agenda.

I bet TIME and Newsweek are on the case; in-between Obama photo shoots.

Has the ACLU weighed in on this? How about Congressman Moran (D-VA)? Has Obama accused Officer Cheeks of acting stupidly yet? Has anybody in the MSM attempted to get a word out of Fred Ellis (director of safety and security for Fairfax County public schools) or Jim McClain (security coordinator)?

Well, there’s always Eric Holder’s In-justice Department to make sure justice is being served. Just ask the New Black Panther Party members who’s voter intimidation charges were inexplicably dropped by Holder (the same Eric Holder that accused America of being a nation of cowards in regards to race) even though the defendants failed to show up in court resulting in default judgments against them.

I couldn't locate a photo of Wesley Cheeks Jr. or any information about him. But, rest assure that Officer Wesley Cheeks would be the most infamous man in America right now had he went after a Pro-Obama protester (particularly a black Pro-Obama protester) in this manner.

Officer Cheeks Jr. would not need to be a white conservative to receive such would-be national scorn. In fact, recent history indicates he may be better off as a white conservative rather than a black one, as the left reserves it’s most lethal venom for black conservatives - Uncle Toms.

But, don’t forget how much the Left loves it’s black people…as long as they know their place. Just ask Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, Larry Elder, or any other black conservative.

Or, do you believe that Democrats were truly celebrating the historical moment of inaugurating the first, simply, black president on January 20th?

The unbroken silence from the left regarding this abuse of power is one in a long history of examples of the left’s contempt for the 1st Amendment and in their contempt for Constitutional due process.

Despite the left’s loud projections of commitment to the protection of these Constitutional rights (and others), they only use these rights as tools to be wielded when, and only when, the conservation of these rights are contextually aligned with a means to their political ends.

Not true you say? Name the Democrats, left-wing organizations, or media personalities that have condemned or mentioned the acts of Officer Wesley Cheeks Jr. on August 25th 2009.

Sep 13, 2009

Horrific Black On White Crimes Gone Unreported by Our MSM - ConfronttheLeft@blogspot.com

Links to this post

I received an email description of one of the most disturbing random acts of violence on a small scale that I’ve ever heard of; the dual kidnapping, rape, torture, murder, and discarding of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom (white couple) on January 6, 2007.



My guess is that the email is currently circulating due to the the 1st of 5 trials having just begun more than 2 years after the crimes took place. The 5 individuals charged with numerous counts are all black:



-Lemaricus Slim Davidson, age 25 (46 charges)
-Latalvis Rome Cobbins, age 24 (46 charges)
-George Detroit Thomas, age 24 (46 charges)
-Vanessa Coleman, age 18 (40 charges)
-Eric E Boyd, age 24 (accessory after the fact)

As you read about the savage event, take a moment to recall the MSM’s infatuation with the feigned Duke rape case.

By the way, Crystal Gail Magnum, the black stripper who tried to destroy the lives of 3 white young men, was not charged for obstruction or for filing a false police report, even though the Attorney General of North Carolina made the distinction that no crime was committed rather than simply dismissing the case for lack of evidence. Now the whore (literal sence of the word) has a book out, and the MSM wont touch her.

Also, as you read about this horrific event, imagine the nation-wide reaction if the races of the victims and perpetrators were reversed.

Here’s a synopsis of the acts of January 6, 2007, including links to similar examples of disinterest in vicious black on white crime, as well as some statistics.

Michelle Malkin had a few words to say on the issue back in 2007.

And finally, for those of you who deny a politically correct racial bias in our MSM; ever hear of the name Kenneth Lee Boyd?

He was the 1,000th convict (white) to be executed since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. He was put to death just days before the celebrated Tucci Williams (black) was.

Despite Mr. Boyd having repented for his double-murder and despite the numerical milestone his execution became, he only received 150 anti-death penalty protesters outside his North Carolina prison accompanied by faint media attention.

Tucci Williams, on the other hand, who went by his gang name till his last day, received global support which spanned from the Vatican, to Germany, to Hollywood, and on.
He received celebrity lased demonstrations outside his prison as Joan Baez sang Swing Low, Sweet Chariot.

He was glorified with a biographical movie starring the bigoted Jamie Foxx (one of his outspoken defenders). And the guy was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Tucci Williams never confessed to his monstrous style killings, including the shooting of a Taiwanese women in the face at point blank range with a shot gun, and killing her parents as well; all for about $125. He reportedly joked about it, referring to the Taiwanese family as Buddha-heads.

Mr. Williams helped start up one of the most notorious street gangs known as the Crips. He reportedly threatened his jurors in court, and spent much time in solitary confinement for repeatedly assaulting prison guards.

It must have been the children’s books Tucci wrote in prison in an attempt to save his own ass, that made the difference. Ya, that’s it.

Jul 16, 2009

The EPA Conceals It's Own Report on Global Warming - ConfronttheLeft.blogspot.com

Links to this post

Remember this statement by Obama: The Days of Science Taking a Back Seat to Ideology are Over

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been caught concealing the release of the final draft of its own internal study which debunks any sense of confidence that man-made CO2 is causing Global Warming.

Here is the report from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI).

Here is the draft version of the EPA study.

You may want to read it, being that you are on the verge of having even more of our liberty confiscated by the Federal Government with the passing of this so-called Cap and Trade bill.
The bill barely past in the House on June 26th and is in route for a Senate vote.

You will be paying more for your energy and for virtually everything you purchase. Even the National Black Chamber of Commerce estimates that 2.7 million jobs will be lost per year (on top of estimated green jobs created):

Here is analysis from the Heritage Foundation.

Companies will move overseas in order to be able to compete with foreign companies that would otherwise take over much of the market share anyways, thus taking over much of the CO2 emissions anyways.

Ever hear these Democrats even acknowledge the tremendous demand for outsourcing that this bill will cause? Remember 8 years of falsely decrying Bush’s outsourcing policies? Now the out-sourcing issue is contextually inconvenient for them. Why? Power

Listen to Obama in his own words.

Here's more from Obama.

Here's a diagram of this bill called the American Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R 2454)

Make sense? Don't worry, the Federal Government will figure it ALL out for you. Just sit back and enjoy the utopia.

In the market for a home? Get ready to pay for all the mandated federal environmental upgrades no matter what state you live in. Need to sell your home? You will first have to upgrade your home to these new federal environmental mandates. California zoning laws will be imposed on every state in the union, thus making home prices higher than they otherwise would be.

Think you've seen the worst of gas prices? Think again.

These are just a couple of the u.nconstitutional command and control federal mandates and effects for you to look forward to during this housing crisis and the (now) worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. Maybe this bill will be just enough to totally destroy the auto-industry and real-estate. Then we can all sit around blaming Bush and singing Kumbaya.

Ask yourself Why a 300 page amendment for this Crap and Tread bill was written in the dead of night (3AM, June 26th) for a vote on the 1200 page bill that day. (Despite Pelosi's 2006 promise of 24 hour public viewing of all bills before a vote

They knew that if the American public caught a whiff of this bill there would be public discontent. Those who voted on June 26th couldn't have even read the bill, because the 300 page amendment wasn't even codified yet!

If you're one of those people who just doesn't care about politics; are you going to care at the pump, the grocery store, when you get your electric bill, when your friend looses his job, when you can't afford to start your new business, when you can't buy that home as soon as you thought you could, when you can't sell your home, or when you loose your job?

And all for a HOAX called Global Warming, which so many of us have bought into. I’m sorry; It’s called Climate Change now, because...

THE PLANET IS NOT WARMING.

Soon it will be called Global Cooling again as it was in the 70’s, and CO2 emissions will remain the cause.

The UK Met Office explained their (2009) coldest winter in a decade like this; if it had not been for the general warming already observed in global temperatures, this winter may well have been even colder.


Here’s a question to ask one who believes in man made global warming: What pattern of climatic behavior, if currently exhibited, would indicate that man made global warming may not exist?

THE NUMBER FOR CAPITOL HILL’S SWITCHBOARD IS (202) 224-3121. THE OPERATOR WILL TRANSFER YOU TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE.

CALL YOUR SENATORS AND KEEP CALLING. JAM THERE PHONE LINES UNTIL THIS BILL REACHES THE SENATE.

Great Books & DVDs: