Successful politics is CHANGING PERCEPTION; not yielding to it.

Does the name RONALD REAGAN ring a bell? You know - the Conservitive guy you fought tooth and nail in Republican primaries, and yet DESPITE YOU became the most successful and influencial Republican icon since Lincoln by confronting the Left with BOLD Conservatism?

Remember that guy?

-November, 7th 2012


'Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us'

My Mission

I created Confront the Left to help defeat the Left in America, by creating a more balanced debate.

My targets are contemporary Liberals: Authoritarians, Statists, counter-revolutionaries, Alinskyites, Democrats, Marxists, Socialists, Progressives, Moderates, special rights groups, Environmentalists, Jihad enablers, leftist Republicans and those who seek to change America.

Much focus will be given to the (3) indoctrination arms of the Left: our main-stream media (MSM), the entertainment industry, and our school system.

I will argue the case for Conservatism (Classic Liberalism) over the soft to hard tyrannies of the Left, which seek to conserve all but liberty, under the veil of compassion.

Confront the Left is committed to confronting the Left's Ant-Americanism, Anti-Semitism, it's logic, lies, semantics, unethical behavior, usurpations, subversive intentions, amoral strategies, criminality, hypocrisy, promotion of victim-hood, promotion of racial inequality, promotion of gender inequality, and ends justify the means strategy.

I will expose the Left's contempt for facts, history, the Scienctific Method, economics, and the Constitution with special attention given to the Eco-Marxist's (term coined by Mark Levin) most brazen assault on Liberty: Global Warming, AKA Climate Change.

Confront the Left will call out the un-patriotic elements and characters on the Left, no matter how loud they decry - I will let no one question my love of this country!

I will expose the reality of Islamic Jihad (Terrorism) as the Left pacifies it.

I will prove that the consolidation of power is the ruling principal of Liberalism.

This blog will help pressure the party of personal responsibility (Republican Party) to start acting and talking like Conservatives.

As the Left struggles to hide it's intent in order to win elections, Conservatism must make it's principles known in order to win elections. Both agendas are motivated by the same realization that Americans will choose Liberty over Collectivism when both arguments are fairly represented.

Political Correctness WILL NOT be represented here; just the naked truth.

Claims made against the Left, including all groups that fit in this tent to some degree, are general statements and ARE NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT ALL who fall into such categories. I understand that most people do not fit their labels entirely, and that there are exceptions and variations of character and thought amongst political movements.

DISCLAIMER: Any Image (Photo, Cartoon, Slogan, etc.) displayed on (this blog) with out indicated on such image is not the creative property of the creator of this blog.

Any image displayed on this blog that is the creative property of the creator of this blog will indicate on such image.

Any literary work (posts, linked material, commentary, etc.) that is not authored by the creator of this blog is italicized or parenthesized.

All literary work displayed on this blog that is not italicized or parenthesized is authored by the creator of this blog, and will usually state so.


My Strategy

Intellectual confrontation is unique in that the means need to justify the ends. This makes intellectual confrontation necessarily limited, and limiting to those who seek power. This understanding lies at the heart of The Enlightenment / Conservatism.

The intellectual battle is like a cage fight; one cannot get out of the cage to win.

Unlike intellectual confrontation, victory in psychological confrontation, like physical confrontation, has no such dependency.

The contemporary Liberal (Statist) is a psychological fighter by vein necessity. He/She subverts the cage to play on the perception of the crowd. They create an appearance of victory and claim to have broken the neck of the Conservative.

He/She is only equipped to fight in the boundless arena of the ends justify the means.

The Conservative must drag the Alinskyite, kicking and screaming, into the cage. It will be ugly, but the crowd will be able to witness and verify the broken neck of the Statist for themselves.

Let’s role...

Government Healthcare Exposed

Links to this post


Medicine is the keystone of the arch of Socialism.
- Vladimir Lenin

I happen to be a proponent of single payer universal health care plans. . . A single payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. And that's what I'd like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House. -Obama

The chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill out here….There is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place.  

Milton Friedman - Curing American Health Care

Milton Friedman - Health Care in a Free Market

The Founders vs. Democrats

For decades, the left has exploited specific rhetorical and general words in the Constitution by removing such words from the context and the intent in which they were written. And they have done so with regard to our healthcare.

When Asked Where the Constitution Authorizes Congress to Order Americans To Buy Health Insurance, Pelosi Says: 'Are You Serious?'

PELOSI (D-CA): But the Constitution gives Congress broad power to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce. Congress has used this authority to regulate many aspects of American life, from labor relations to education to health care to agricultural production. Since virtually every aspect of the heath care system has an effect on interstate commerce, the power of Congress to regulate health care is essentially unlimited.

This is remarkable, not simply for the perverse interpretation of the Constitution - or dare I say lie, but for it’s stunning admission. Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of the U.S. Congress, has just told you that she along with the rest of Congress has the authority to dictate when, where, how, and if you receive healthcare.

If you do not have the right to make your own decisions regarding the well being of your own person, what rights, at all, can you claim?

Any of you right to privacy – it’s my body – pro-choice types have a problem with this? Of course not. Why would you?

Americans need to understand some simple reasoning: if one’s right to remain secure in his person, property, and effects is compromised, all other rights are compromised.

JAMES MADISON (Author of U.S. Constitution: Yet it is very certain that it [commerce clause] grew out of the abuse of the power by the importing States in taxing the nonimporting, and was intended as a negative and preventive provision against injustice among the States themselves, rather than as a power to be used for the positive purposes of the General Government, in which alone, however, the remedial power could be lodged.

JAMES MADISON: The powers of the federal government are enumerated; it can only operate in certain cases; it has legislative powers on defined and limited objects, beyond which it cannot extend its jurisdiction.

JAMES MADISON (Federalist Papers #45): The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined.

The word regulate in the Commerce Clause meant to keep uniform or normalized, not obstruct or meddle. The same meaning of the word is used today when one says I’ve been regular lately - pardon the analogy.

The founders did not want the states to tax or impose duties on commerce from other states, as some colonies had been doing. The purpose of the Commerce Clause was not to give Congress authority to meddle in the affairs of commerce, but to protect commerce from state meddling.

Even if we are to except the Pelosi interpretation of regulate, the clause does not state - to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce. It states To regulate commerce, specifically.

According to Pelosi's view - one can make the argument that anything one does has an effect on commerce. And the Left has done just that, which undermines the whole purpose of our Constitution's Article: 1 – Section: 8, which was to limit the power of the Federal Government in implicit and undeniable terms.

LEAHY (D-VT): We have plenty of authority [for Congress to give an individual mandate for health insurance]. Are you saying there is no authority?...Why would you say there is no authority?...I mean, there’s no question there’s authority. Nobody questions that...
Where do we have the authority to set speed limits on an interstate highway?

Vermont must be proud. The carrier Senator wasn’t even correct in saying that the Federal Government sets speed limits, let alone in his claim it has authority to do so.

Even if we took Leahy’s assertion that the federal government has the authority to set speed limits and is currently acting on it, how does this equate to a mandate upon citizens to purchase healthcare insurance?

THOMAS JEFFERSON (Founding Father - Author of Declaration of Independence):
A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second, that second for a third, and so on 'til the bulk of society is reduced to mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering...and the forehorse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.

JAMES MADISON: If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.

PATRICK HENRY (Declared 'Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death'): The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.

JAMES MADISON: I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. 

To be continued...

Health Problem Quantified


(i.e., trusting politicians and bureaucrats with your healthcare)

Sebelius: Insurers Who Criticize ObamaCare May Get Locked out of System

Does ObamaCare trump the First Amendment?  HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius must think so.  Yesterday, after apparently tiring of criticism of the new law from the companies it will eventually put out of business, Sebelius offered to expedite that process for those who don’t take an opportunity to shut their mouths...

See how committed the Left is to freedom of speech? Just don't say anything that is disagreeable...and you are free to speak. 

Progressivism is Marxism in increments.




ObamaCare Promise of No Rationing Broken by FDA

It is critical to note, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not propose denying cancer victims the right to the drug because of the safety of the drug, but because of a formula containing cost as factor...

This kicks the decision until after the fall Congressional elections.  It will be much easier for the FDA to make a difficult decision after the election removing pressure from Americans who oppose government rationed care.


Obama Today: 'We Knew' Health Care Costs Would Rise. Obama Before: Health Care Costs Will Go Down if We Pass This Bill…

As a consequence of us getting 30 million additional people healthcare, at the margins that's going to increase our costs - we knew that. We didn't think that we were going to cover 30 million people for free. - Obama

We know you knew that when you were insisting the exact opposite - you JACK-ASS.

Obama Promises Lower Cost

...just like unemployment wasn't going to go over 8%
after the stimulus bill was passed.

 Noticing a pattern?

ObamaCare Bends the Cost Curve … Upward

Oh well...but, hey - look at the bright side; IT'S HISTORIC.

Jake Tapper Asks Obama About Dems Running Against Obamacare



In addition to capturing the massive expansion of government and the overwhelming complexity of new regulations and taxes, the chart portrays:

-$569 billion in higher taxes;
-$529 billion in cuts to Medicare;
swelling of the ranks of Medicaid by 16 million;
-17 major insurance mandates; and
the creation of two new bureaucracies with powers to impose future rationing: the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Independent Payments Advisory Board.

Brady admits committee analysts could not fit the entire health care bill on one chart. 'This portrays only about one-third of the complexity of the final bill. It’s actually worse than this.'

Deny This: Guess Who Has the Highest Medical Claim Rejection Rate?

It's all about CON-passion.
REMEMBER: All of this is being done for YOU...sucker!

Healthcare Clause May Break Obama Vow to Keep Plans

Welcome to health-care as a RIGHT.

FACT CHECK: Health Care Small Biz Tax Cut Elusive: Will Health Care Land Your Small Biz a Tax Credit? The Numbers May Not Add for All

Zach Hoffman owner of
Wiley Office Furniture
in Springfield, Ill.

Are These Folks Disingenuous or Dreaming?

Donald Berwick on Redistributing Wealth

Excellent healthcare is by definition - redistributional.
Brittan - you chose well. - Donald Berwick, 2008

RATIONING WITH OPEN EYES: The Consequences of Donald Berwick’s Agenda

The decision is not whether or not we will ration care - the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. -Donald Berwick, 2009

What Lies Beneath

The economic report released last week by Health and Human Services, which indicated that...

...President Barack Obama's health care 'reform' law would actually increase the cost of health care and impose higher costs on consumers, had been submitted to the office of HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius more than a week before the Congressional votes on the bill, according to career HHS sources, who added that Sebelius's staff refused to review the document before the vote was taken.

Powerful Rationing Panel (Not Doctors) Will Control Health Care Levels

It's called Leftist SEMANTICS.

What do you think the effect of a Medicare advisory board is?

When this UNELECTED advisory board arbitrarily cuts off Medicare coverage for particular medical procedures, drugs, and/or products that may save some lives - but may not save many lives - and therefore is not considered quality healthcare
- what do you call that?

When this UNELECTED advisory board arbitrarily cuts off Medicare coverage for particular medical procedures, drugs, and/or products due to a
cost-benefit analysis or Complete Lives System - i.e. the expense is not worth the tax revenue these old people will generate back into the system - what do you call that?

New 'Safety Plan' Would Control What You Eat
(S. 510 -The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010)

I wonder (not really); WILL THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BEGIN TO REGULATE ANAL SEX - being that it the Federal Government is in the business of finding ways to unburden our healthcare system by regulating our private lives?

The medical community has been aware of the higher health risks associated with anal sex. Here is a list of anal sex health risks:

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): there is no doubt that anal intercourse carries a greater risk of transmission of HIV - the virus that can cause acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) - than other sexual activities, particularly for the receptive partner.

Human papilloma virus (HPV, wart virus): this can be transmitted during anal intercourse and lead to anal warts, which in turn could perhaps predispose infected individuals to cancer of the anal canal.

Hepatitis A (infectious hepatitis): this is a viral infection that can cause jaundice and abdominal pain. Hepatitis A is not usually a life-threatening illness, although sufferers can feel quite ill. It can be transmitted by oral-anal contact.

Hepatitis C: is a cause of progressive and sometimes fatal chronic liver disease. Hepatitis C may be transmitted by anal intercourse, although this seems to be a rare occurrence. Sharing of equipment for intravenous drug use is a far more important risk for transmission.

To be clear - I do not support any level of government meddling in our private lives.

 But it is the authoritarian Left (not humanitarian) who decry
STAY OUT OF MY BEDROOM while they are in our wallets and in virtually every aspect of our private lives.

These are the same people who want to CONTROL YOUR BODY (your healthcare),

Hello Small Business! 25 Ways the New Healthcare Law Impacts You


Healthcare Reform Law: Timeline for Small Business  -

Ready for what's coming America?
You didn't think they were going to stop at healthcare did ya?

The Institute of Medicine made this recommendation in its report entitled
Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States.

 Institute of Medicine?
What they really mean is the Institute of Promoting Dietary Laws.

Which step of the scientific method entails recommending laws?
It must be in the Hippocratic Oath.

- Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter

 It's HISTORIC: House Democrats Looking to Slaughter the U.S. Constitution

Nancy Pelosi: We Have To Pass The Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It (Video)



House Speaker Pelosi Admits JAIL is Fair for Not Buying Health Insurance (Video)

Pelosi on Obama's CSPAN Pledge: There Are a Number of Things He Was For on the Campaign Trail (Video)

- Mark Bonokoski

 In Alberta, Canada a Cancer patient must pay for drug needed to keep him alive.

 (HINT: It has to do with reconciling the budget, not raming through healthcare bills.
This is why it's not called The Raming Through Healthcare Policy Process)

Nothing Says GRASSROOTS Like Advertising to PAY People to Organize

No comments:

Post a Comment

Great Books & DVDs: