Successful politics is CHANGING PERCEPTION; not yielding to it.

Does the name RONALD REAGAN ring a bell? You know - the Conservitive guy you fought tooth and nail in Republican primaries, and yet DESPITE YOU became the most successful and influencial Republican icon since Lincoln by confronting the Left with BOLD Conservatism?

Remember that guy?

-November, 7th 2012


'Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us'

My Mission

I created Confront the Left to help defeat the Left in America, by creating a more balanced debate.

My targets are contemporary Liberals: Authoritarians, Statists, counter-revolutionaries, Alinskyites, Democrats, Marxists, Socialists, Progressives, Moderates, special rights groups, Environmentalists, Jihad enablers, leftist Republicans and those who seek to change America.

Much focus will be given to the (3) indoctrination arms of the Left: our main-stream media (MSM), the entertainment industry, and our school system.

I will argue the case for Conservatism (Classic Liberalism) over the soft to hard tyrannies of the Left, which seek to conserve all but liberty, under the veil of compassion.

Confront the Left is committed to confronting the Left's Ant-Americanism, Anti-Semitism, it's logic, lies, semantics, unethical behavior, usurpations, subversive intentions, amoral strategies, criminality, hypocrisy, promotion of victim-hood, promotion of racial inequality, promotion of gender inequality, and ends justify the means strategy.

I will expose the Left's contempt for facts, history, the Scienctific Method, economics, and the Constitution with special attention given to the Eco-Marxist's (term coined by Mark Levin) most brazen assault on Liberty: Global Warming, AKA Climate Change.

Confront the Left will call out the un-patriotic elements and characters on the Left, no matter how loud they decry - I will let no one question my love of this country!

I will expose the reality of Islamic Jihad (Terrorism) as the Left pacifies it.

I will prove that the consolidation of power is the ruling principal of Liberalism.

This blog will help pressure the party of personal responsibility (Republican Party) to start acting and talking like Conservatives.

As the Left struggles to hide it's intent in order to win elections, Conservatism must make it's principles known in order to win elections. Both agendas are motivated by the same realization that Americans will choose Liberty over Collectivism when both arguments are fairly represented.

Political Correctness WILL NOT be represented here; just the naked truth.

Claims made against the Left, including all groups that fit in this tent to some degree, are general statements and ARE NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT ALL who fall into such categories. I understand that most people do not fit their labels entirely, and that there are exceptions and variations of character and thought amongst political movements.

DISCLAIMER: Any Image (Photo, Cartoon, Slogan, etc.) displayed on (this blog) with out indicated on such image is not the creative property of the creator of this blog.

Any image displayed on this blog that is the creative property of the creator of this blog will indicate on such image.

Any literary work (posts, linked material, commentary, etc.) that is not authored by the creator of this blog is italicized or parenthesized.

All literary work displayed on this blog that is not italicized or parenthesized is authored by the creator of this blog, and will usually state so.


My Strategy

Intellectual confrontation is unique in that the means need to justify the ends. This makes intellectual confrontation necessarily limited, and limiting to those who seek power. This understanding lies at the heart of The Enlightenment / Conservatism.

The intellectual battle is like a cage fight; one cannot get out of the cage to win.

Unlike intellectual confrontation, victory in psychological confrontation, like physical confrontation, has no such dependency.

The contemporary Liberal (Statist) is a psychological fighter by vein necessity. He/She subverts the cage to play on the perception of the crowd. They create an appearance of victory and claim to have broken the neck of the Conservative.

He/She is only equipped to fight in the boundless arena of the ends justify the means.

The Conservative must drag the Alinskyite, kicking and screaming, into the cage. It will be ugly, but the crowd will be able to witness and verify the broken neck of the Statist for themselves.

Let’s role...

Nov 18, 2009

What's In a Logo? -

For those of us who have been paying attention to the seemingly endless number of spears in Obama’s side (all rendered benign by our media and by many American citizens willing to digest their daily dose of Statist rhetoric) the fallowing revelation will not surprise.

Obama’s guilt by collaboration (not association) with Bill Ayers (Communist Anti-American domestic terrorist with the Weather Underground), may run even deeper than what those of us who are blinded by reality originally thought.

For those of you who have mentally de-clawed Obama’s anti-American goals and passions, this may cause your cognitive-dissidence to swell.
I recently stumbled upon a few websites that displayed Obama’s campaign logo (O logo) alongside Weather Underground (WU) logos for comparative purposes. Each website picked up on some striking similarities between the O logo and the 2 WU logos.

Zomblog displays the first issue of Osawatomie, a newspaper published by the Weather Underground in 1975. The paper’s content can be viewed on their site.

Zomblog shows the circular WU logo (displayed on the the newspaper’s cover) with the O logo.

I Own the World shows a comparison of the WU Weather Eye Logo and the O logo.

Upon viewing the comparisons, I immediately noticed something that even these great websites have not picked up on. I saw the O logo, in it’s entirety, as a simple and precise borrowing of the two WU logos.

I decided to do a little research on the creation of the O logo. Obviously, Sol Sender, the lead creator of the O logo, does not mention the WU logos as inspiration. But, I found what was the O logo before it’s final subtle tweak.

This fallowing image of the campaign logo brought my vision of the borrowing of the 2 WU logos too clear to sit on.

Here is Sol Sender in his own words:

Originally the stripes were kind of symmetrically expressed across the horizon, and as we went into final refinements we felt that giving it a little bit more dimension, a little bit more motion, ways to enter into it a little bit more for the viewer was a better way to go.

Only 20 minutes after I began to re-create the O logo using ONLY the 2 WU logos, this was the result along side the pre-dimension O logo.

It was too easy:

FIRST - I brought the top portion of the rainbow like WU logo to the middle of the circular WU logo.

SECOND - I cut out a circle along the circular WU logo parameters.

That was it.

I am not saying this is incontrovertible proof that Obama used the WU logos to create his O logo.

I am saying that this apparent link is extraordinary and should be looked into further, if possible.

If, in fact, the O logo was born out of the 2 WU logos, it would confirm that Obama is the true believer – the radical that I and many others know he is. It would mean that Obama felt he needed a symbol of radicalism (Marxism essentially) for him to privately identify with, while the masses see a crop-field (more like a Mao rice field) under a rising sun inside an O.

Obviously, there are countless symbols, logos, branding styles, and creative possibilities detached from WU symbolism which Obama could have drawn from - if he wanted to. There were countless possibilities for logos which would have been just as effective from a marketing standpoint. And it’s not as if the WU logos are particularly inspirational pieces of design.

If you think there is nothing significant about this apparent connection between the O logo and the WU logos, please take only 20 minutes of your time to re-create the O logo from any other single organization’s branding, in just two simple steps resulting in such a precise likeness.

As we conservatives thrive on having our theories challenged, (No - the debate is not over) I’m curious to see if someone can do it.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Great Books & DVDs: