Successful politics is CHANGING PERCEPTION; not yielding to it.

Does the name RONALD REAGAN ring a bell? You know - the Conservitive guy you fought tooth and nail in Republican primaries, and yet DESPITE YOU became the most successful and influencial Republican icon since Lincoln by confronting the Left with BOLD Conservatism?

Remember that guy?

-November, 7th 2012


'Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us'

My Mission

I created Confront the Left to help defeat the Left in America, by creating a more balanced debate.

My targets are contemporary Liberals: Authoritarians, Statists, counter-revolutionaries, Alinskyites, Democrats, Marxists, Socialists, Progressives, Moderates, special rights groups, Environmentalists, Jihad enablers, leftist Republicans and those who seek to change America.

Much focus will be given to the (3) indoctrination arms of the Left: our main-stream media (MSM), the entertainment industry, and our school system.

I will argue the case for Conservatism (Classic Liberalism) over the soft to hard tyrannies of the Left, which seek to conserve all but liberty, under the veil of compassion.

Confront the Left is committed to confronting the Left's Ant-Americanism, Anti-Semitism, it's logic, lies, semantics, unethical behavior, usurpations, subversive intentions, amoral strategies, criminality, hypocrisy, promotion of victim-hood, promotion of racial inequality, promotion of gender inequality, and ends justify the means strategy.

I will expose the Left's contempt for facts, history, the Scienctific Method, economics, and the Constitution with special attention given to the Eco-Marxist's (term coined by Mark Levin) most brazen assault on Liberty: Global Warming, AKA Climate Change.

Confront the Left will call out the un-patriotic elements and characters on the Left, no matter how loud they decry - I will let no one question my love of this country!

I will expose the reality of Islamic Jihad (Terrorism) as the Left pacifies it.

I will prove that the consolidation of power is the ruling principal of Liberalism.

This blog will help pressure the party of personal responsibility (Republican Party) to start acting and talking like Conservatives.

As the Left struggles to hide it's intent in order to win elections, Conservatism must make it's principles known in order to win elections. Both agendas are motivated by the same realization that Americans will choose Liberty over Collectivism when both arguments are fairly represented.

Political Correctness WILL NOT be represented here; just the naked truth.

Claims made against the Left, including all groups that fit in this tent to some degree, are general statements and ARE NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT ALL who fall into such categories. I understand that most people do not fit their labels entirely, and that there are exceptions and variations of character and thought amongst political movements.

DISCLAIMER: Any Image (Photo, Cartoon, Slogan, etc.) displayed on (this blog) with out indicated on such image is not the creative property of the creator of this blog.

Any image displayed on this blog that is the creative property of the creator of this blog will indicate on such image.

Any literary work (posts, linked material, commentary, etc.) that is not authored by the creator of this blog is italicized or parenthesized.

All literary work displayed on this blog that is not italicized or parenthesized is authored by the creator of this blog, and will usually state so.


My Strategy

Intellectual confrontation is unique in that the means need to justify the ends. This makes intellectual confrontation necessarily limited, and limiting to those who seek power. This understanding lies at the heart of The Enlightenment / Conservatism.

The intellectual battle is like a cage fight; one cannot get out of the cage to win.

Unlike intellectual confrontation, victory in psychological confrontation, like physical confrontation, has no such dependency.

The contemporary Liberal (Statist) is a psychological fighter by vein necessity. He/She subverts the cage to play on the perception of the crowd. They create an appearance of victory and claim to have broken the neck of the Conservative.

He/She is only equipped to fight in the boundless arena of the ends justify the means.

The Conservative must drag the Alinskyite, kicking and screaming, into the cage. It will be ugly, but the crowd will be able to witness and verify the broken neck of the Statist for themselves.

Let’s role...

Environmentalism Exposed

Links to this post



Let me know with a comment below.


 Eco-Marxists (Environmentalists) choose to view the ecosystem as a living organism - with humanity as ia parasite - because living organisms are vulnerable to death. There's just one problem with that view:


The ecosystem is a complex multifaceted system - consisting of numerous goals and agendas of numerous living organisms (INCLUDING HUMANS) - combined with numerous interactions between numerous elements and molecules - combined with numerous mutations leading to numerous adaptations.


So, what is bad or good for something that adapts and has no agenda?


It would be hard to pass regulatory legislation to control our lives with this proper understanding being the popular understanding, so it is imperative to the Environmentalist that the public's perception of the ecosystem be perverted with non-science.

Why I Am Not An Environmentalist:
The Science of Economics Versus the Religion of Ecology

Steven E. Landsburg

Excerpt from The Armchair Economist: Economics & Everyday Life
by Steven E. Landsbur (pp. 223-231)

The Scientific Method

Next time someone from GreenPeace - or some other Enviro-Marxist group - solicits your support, ask them to recite the basic steps of

- Author of Silent Spring

- Key player in bringing about the 1972 ban on the pesticide DDT  [Which
has Resulted in the Deaths of Tens of Millions of Africans]

Rachel Carson


Left to Right:
Keith One Tree Briffa
Michael Bristlecone Mann
James Data Distorter Hansen
 Phil Data Destroyer Jones

- Christopher Booker

NOTHING global warming TO lies SEE emails HERE

More than 3,000 e-mails and documents from Phil Jones - climate scientist and director of the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) , Michael Mann - director of the Pennsylvania State University's Earth System Science Center, and from some who are considered to be of the world's most influential climatologists were published on the Internet, after a CRU server was hacked.

Numerous emails show prominant Global Warming scientists conspiring to manipulate and suppress climate data.

I better study up on the Scientific Method again, because I don't recall the manipulation and suppression tenets.

 I'm sure you've seen the GLOBAL WARMING SCANDAL headlines across the front pages of every national and local newspaper, as I'm sure you've been equally bombarded by countless breaking news segments and in depth investigative reports on this scandal of global proportions. RIGHT?

Just in case you have managed to slip through the cracks of our nations stop at nothing to expose the truth news blitz, HERE is the story from The Wall Street Journal.

Here are some excerpts from some of the more incriminating emails, courtesy of the WSJ.

For those of you who would like to dig deeper into this story, has been created for the sole purpose of allowing the public to research the database of emails.

Environmental Extremist Gunman Attacks Discovery Channel Headquarters

James J. Lee

The Discovery Channel MUST Broadcast to the World their Commitment
to Save the Planet and to do the Following IMMEDIATELY...

Mark Levin Interviews Christopher Horner Of The Competitive Enterprise Institute 

Actor Ed Begley Jr. Speaks after Van Jones, Before He Became the 'Green Jobs' Czar (MUST SEE)

Actor Ed Begley Jr. insists that peer review is the only trustworthy way to gauge the validity of global warming theory. But e-mails from scientists who have controlled the peer-review process reveal that they have perverted the sytem to the point that peer review of global warming data is unreliable.

Notice how Ed Begley Jr. is the decider of who's opinions and/or research should be given consideration? Spoken like a true Eco-Marxist. 

Not only is Ed Begley not a scientist, he is not scientific.

Science doesn't determine the legitimacy of arguments and data based on who presents them, or based on what type of academic degree in science one has, or even based on whether or not one has a degree.

Science is the objective pursuit of truth about phenomena based on human experimentation and observation by way of The Scientific Method. Therefor anybody who practices the scientific method is a scientist, just as many who have science credentials are not scientists - as they reject the scientific method in practice.

The purpose of peer review in science is for a scientist's methods and data to be scrutinized by his/her peers, as REAL SCIENCE embraces all arguments, data, and evidence in order to best discern what is true.

Anytime a scientist makes public his/her work and/or their analysis of their peer's work, they are engaging in the process of peer review.

We no longer live in an age where one's work needs to be publish by a particular journal (over-run by Environmentalists) in order for ones scientific peers to have access to it.
(I thought Progressives were all about adapting to the times?)

Nobody owns the rights to the process of having scientific work publicly scrutinized.

From a scientific perspective, whether or not ones work or analysis has been peer reviewed, does not determine the value or merit of ones work or analysis.
It just means that ones peers have or have not reviewed their work.

In fact, it is un-scientific to judge ones work or analysis UNTIL it is properly reviewed.

To further illustrate what a schmuck Mr. Ed is
(I mean schmuck in the most scientific sense of the word), the guy dismisses a physicist (one who studies physics) as unqualified to speak intelligently about climate.

Hey Ed! What phenomena doesn't involve matter and energy?

Here's a taste of what physics encompasses:

Astronomy, Cosmology, gravity, radiation,
Anisotropy, Astaticism, Atomology, Biophysics, Ceraunics, Crystallography, Diamagnetism, Dynamometry, Electrotropism, Energetics, Energism, Faradism, Focimetry, Franklinism, Galvanism, Galvanology, Galvanometry, Geophysics, Meteorology, Oceanography, Volcanology, Seismology, Gyrostatics, Halology, Homeomorphism, Hydraulics, Hydrodynamics, Hydrokinetics, Hydromechanics, Hydrostatics, Hygrometry, Isomorphism, Kinematics, Magnetology, Monosymmetry, Optotechnics, Oscillography, Osmometry, Physicism, Plenism, Pleochroism, Pleochromatism, Polychroism, Polychromatism, Pyrology, Radiometry, Radiophony, Spectrobolometry, Staties, Sympalmograph, Telemechanics, Thermionics, Thermostatics,Tribology, Trichroism, Trichromatism, Trochilics, Vacuism, and Voltaism.

Charlton Heston on Global Climate Change  (Video)

Here's a glimpse into BIG GOVERNMENT'S hold on Big Oil / YOU;
and people wonder why gas prices are high and why BP's oil leak is so INACCESSIBLE.

Here's some interesting info:

President Bush issued a Presidential Directive in 1990 that enacted a blanket moratorium until 2000 on all unleased areas offshore Northern and Central California, Southern California except for 87 tracts, Washington, Oregon, the North Atlantic coast, and the Eastern Gulf of Mexico coast. Separate from the annual moratoria in appropriations legislation, this directive meant that no leasing or pre-leasing activities were allowed to occur in these areas during the entire period. In 1998 President Clinton extended the moratorium through 2012.

 I thought Bush Sr. was a Big Oil guy?

Here's another teaser:

Environmental laws and regulations have also had a large impact on the natural gas and oil industry. Concerns over impacts on the environmental and coastal communities led to withdrawals of leasing land in the OCS through Presidential moratoria in effect until 2012, annual moratoria enacted by Congress, and coastal States using their veto power under the Coastal Zone Management Act. Other environmental laws may limit natural gas and oil activities by imposing additional requirements enforced by various Federal departments and agencies. These include: The National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, and the National Fishing Enhancement Act.

Another set of regulations has been established in the past few decades to manage revenue received from individuals and companies who lease offshore lands for natural gas and oil development. Regulations such as the DWRRA offer incentives to pursue natural gas and oil in areas where it may be economically infeasible to drill otherwise. There are also rules that ensure the equitable distribution of the revenue. Depending on the location of the lease area, revenue is divided among affected coastal States, the U.S. Land and Water Conservation Fund, the National Historic Preservation Fund, and the U.S. Treasury.

And where in the U.S. Constitution does the Federal Government, or the Executive branch exclusively, have the authority to conserve land? Do tell...

War on the West II

The EPA Conceals It's Own Report on Global Warming

(4 Part Video)


Staring Micheal Mann - Global Warming Defrauder

Click HERE for a list of other fun videos staring Micheal Mann
and other Global Warming defrauders.

DOE Office of Petroleum Reserves – Strategic Unconventional Fuels

About 1.8 TRILLION BARRELS of shale oil
are thought to reside in deposits greater than 15 gallons per
ton in the Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

I guess it's come to having to use ELEMENTARY SCIENCE
to expose Environmentalism.

Click HERE for a list of other insightful videos exposing
one Global Warming LIE after another.

...but experts say an astonishing amount has disappeared, reabsorbed into the environment. '[It's] mother nature doing her job,' said Ed Overton, a professor of environmental studies at Louisiana State University.

Imagine that! You mean the environment is not the fragile balancing act that
Environmentalists claim it is?

Surely Environmentalists will take note of this phenomena and adjust their view of
Mother Nature, right?  Of course they wont.

The Obama Administration, and the Environmentalist laden Federal Government generally, are assisting in the destruction of the Gulf Coast in order to further their PR assault on Big Oil and to push Cap and Trade.

...the Obama administration’s EPA decided to apply the full force of the Clean Air Act to carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, and simply ignore the inconvenient requirements of the law. In effect, the EPA has promoted itself to a position as super-legislature of the United States, arbitrarily rewriting the law to suit its purposes.

During [William] Reilly's tenure, the EPA implemented policies that prevented the development of a high-tech method to mitigate the effects of the oil washing onto the magnificent beaches along the Gulf Coast from Texas to Florida.

The Physician and Molecular Biologist is a Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.


Stunning Pictures of Al Gore's New $9 Million Mansion Media Totally Ignored


George Carlin - Saving the Planet



A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes The Global Warming Scam (Autographed) - Brian Sussman




The Crux Of The Global Warming Fraud: Global Warmingistas Claim CO2 Drives Temperature, But Just The Opposite
Is True -

Remember Al Gore's Timeline from
An Inconvenient Truth?

Sorry Mr. Gore, YOUR OWN CHART (when looked at closely) suggests

That's NOT very convenient, is it Al?

But, you'll be fine. You've already made $700,000,000 off peddling this GLOBAL FRAUD
at the world economy's expense.

every day for the rest of your life with that much doe!

White House Science ‘Czar’ Tells Students: U.S. Can’t Expect to Be Number One in Science and Technology Forever

John Holdren

- Mark Landsbaum
- Barbara Hollingsworth

Global Warming Rope-A-Dope - Walter Williams

No comments:

Post a Comment

Great Books & DVDs: